e val Bringing evaluation theory and practice closer together

Skip to content.

Evaluate Europe

Sections
Personal tools
You are here: Home » Members » Scheuermann's Home » USING KIRKPATRICK’S FOUR-LEVEL-EVALUATION MODEL

USING KIRKPATRICK’S FOUR-LEVEL-EVALUATION MODEL

Review Item Posted by Friedrich Scheuermann -Last Updated: Fri-08-October-2004

USING KIRKPATRICK’S FOUR-LEVEL-EVALUATION MODEL

Article by Colin Baskin
Published
Publisher : ASCILITE
Name of issue : ASCILITE 2001 Conference, p.37-44
Date of issue : 2001
Web address : https://www.fdi.vt.edu/Archive/PDFs/2002/Webinstruction/baskin.pdf
Language : English

Subjective Assesment

A nice practical example of the application of Kirkpatrick's evaluation model for exploring the effectiveness of collaborative online group work at university level.

Overview

From the abstract: "This paper examines two cohorts of students, each engaged in the same course of study but using different means of engagement. One cohort of 90 students completed a real time learning program integrating group dynamics, action research, team performance and participative decision-making (Tuckman & Jensen, 1977: Belbin, 1981: Dick, 1986: Hopson & Scally, 1982). A second cohort of 171 students completed the same course of study in an online environment. Satisfaction ratings were drawn across the real-time and online cohorts, the data structured and critically mined using a four level evaluation of learning model (Kirkpatrick, 1996) to explore student-learning outcomes related to online group work. Findings indicate that the real time student sample recorded a significantly higher satisfaction rating in some aspects of their group learning experiences than their online counterparts. Further examination of the learning outcomes of the online cohort of students using level two, level three, and level four evaluation strategies (Kirkpatrick, 1996), suggests that the online group work model successfully supports group learning behaviours, transfer of these behaviours to practice, and improvement in learner behaviours at the enterprise level. Despite some differences in between group learning outcomes, online group work was seen to add value to the group learning experience."

Methodology

Kirkpatrick's four level evaluation model

Results

The author succeeded in the development of findings relating to the reserach topic (online collaboration) and identification of differences from 2 settings by applying the tools mentionned.

Conclusions

Issues

Related Documents

 

Powered by Plone

This site conforms to the following standards: